Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180131
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '18 at 05:32
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 87.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 908 80% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,249 77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 111 Parallax 103 86% 106 fps	MRender 95 Gravity 97.5 Splatting 88.8 76% 93.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 2,001 Write 1,201 Mixed 1,153 320% 1,452 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 55.7 187% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 30.2 89% 193 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 235%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 112GB free Firmware: 5.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4501553 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 71820443147880 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2429 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 222 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 56 38658375716 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4501553 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4501553 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4501553 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 33645 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10242 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10242 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12210	74.1% Very good	Read 494 Write 198 Mixed 236 68% 309 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 19.6 113% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 50.2 80% 152 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 83%
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB 534 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 27GB free Firmware: PNDA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5710 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2622 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 2679 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 3936 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 55554840 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5286618	49.9% Average	Read 428 Write 232 Mixed 307 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 9.52 56% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 64.8 DQ Write 37.9 DQ Mixed 21.3 24% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 56%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 143 359 (03) Spinup time 194 175 7300 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2568 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13327 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1371 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 160 160 121520 (C2) HDA temperature 111 92 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 141 137 23957	66.7% Good	Read 105 Write 127 Mixed 107 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.21 91% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 889GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 175 5850 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2657 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8973 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 769 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 125 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 31385 (C2) HDA temperature 111 93 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78.7% Very good	Read 140 Write 134 Mixed 123 100% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.22 95% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60 17,279 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 47.3 MC Write 42.9 MC Mixed 36.3 120% 42.2 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 43.7 SC Mixed 31.3 96% 33.7 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)