Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A55M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45 5,882 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 86 1-Core 63.9 2-Core 102 55% 84.1 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 180 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36BE) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.2% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 43.7 Parallax 41.5 36% 43 fps	MRender 39.8 Gravity 40.5 Splatting 35.5 31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2959 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1363 (B1) Unknown 98 98 38 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 35 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 27 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14845991750	60.8% Good	Read 266 Write 208 Mixed 217 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 25.4 114% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 16.5 30% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$148 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 4178 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 146030592034 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 557 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 63GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 91 (03) Spinup time 121 121 12897353918 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5718 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14870 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5128 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5719 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5719 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 223339085851 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 397	42.2% Average	Read 75.4 Write 71.6 Mixed 79.6 57% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.26 65% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 12 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11.6 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	6x
A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $265Bench 48%, 6,606 samples	3x

GPU
HD 7790AMDBench 20%, 8,590 samples	12x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	5x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	5x
PM830 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 54%, 663 samples	4x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 40%, 643 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16