Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130922
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 23:41
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$79
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 89.5
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 140
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 180
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19.4
17% 19 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.3
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
105GB free
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 186
Write 106
Mixed 109
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 3.72
48% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 4.21
29% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 70%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 376
Write 104
Mixed 102
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 7.82
58% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 69
DQ Mixed 7.29
16% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
197GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 141
Write 132
Mixed 125
100% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.31
85% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback