Hp-pavilion KJ379AAR-ABA a6400f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion KJ379AAR-ABA a6400f  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Benicia
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 03:23
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 74
40% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 149
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 1.34
3% 3.25 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4OA57A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.5
Write 79.7
Mixed 70.9
58% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.33
69% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback