HP h9-1190jp

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP h9-1190jp (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2ACE
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120917
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '18 at 07:53
Run Duration	349 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3960X 4,885 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 188 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 554 54% 442 Pts	64-Core 715 44% 715 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Nvidia(10DE 0947) 1.5GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Lighting 27.1 Reflection 41.5 Parallax 30.7 22% 33.1 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 31.3 26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB 460 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: A5Q0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 86 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 100 88 (03) Spinup time 143 100 34385297820 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 483 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 100 26 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 49247 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BC) Unknown 100 99 744161282 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 489226275 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 484 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 484 (C2) HDA temperature 171 146 180389478435 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	15% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 24 Mixed 20.4 18% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.26 63% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 88%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 81GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Generic External 160GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 4GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB 7,298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 33.7 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP h9-1190jp

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)