HP p6-2000nl

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP p6-2000nl  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120118
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateApr 02 '18 at 15:38
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 66.4
35% 54.1 Pts
4-Core 67.5
8-Core 63.6
9% 65.6 Pts
64-Core 66.9
4% 66.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 9.12
6% 8.5 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 8.43
6% 7.56 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55
518GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 121
Write 110
Mixed 104
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.31
87% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback