MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A57
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '18 at 20:26
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 193
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 560
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A57) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.82% Terrible
Lighting 8.33
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.28
7% 9.49 fps
MRender 9.95
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 16.6
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.82%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 104
Parallax 94.5
81% 99.2 fps
MRender 84.9
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 81.9
70% 85.4 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
274GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 409
Mixed 415
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 38.1
156% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 106
118% 200 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5-a9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 937
Write 654
Mixed 719
171% 770 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 17.7
126% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 17.1
84% 191 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 126%
Great: 153%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
170GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 503
Write 347
Mixed 355
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 25.3
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 80.6
72% 103 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 126%
Nvme INTEL MEMPEK1W01 14GB
9GB free
Firmware: 0310 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 845
Write 144
Mixed 249
89% 413 MB/s
4K Read 155
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 85.3
386% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 183
151% 222 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 169%
Great: 243%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$169
7TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 193
Mixed 201
143% 189 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 4.03
4K Mixed 0.77
212% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 23
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) Builds (Compare 1,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,137
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback