| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140812 |
| Uptime | 3.3 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 24 '16 at 21:21 |
| Run Duration | 91 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.5%
Very good
|
78% 134 Pts
|
38% 282 Pts
|
18% 284 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gainward(10B0 1381) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4475
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
15% 16.9 fps
|
15% 18.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
100% 135 MB/s
|
85% 0.88 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend TS512MLK64V6H 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
33.2%
Below average
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
64% 62.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,100 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 1,181x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 500x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 489x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 565x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 477x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 412x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $287 |