Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '18 at 12:49
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 881
88% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.1% Above average
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 63
64% 72.2 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 62
50% 60.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$194
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,147
Write 1,251
Mixed 1,579
367% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 51.5
171% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 153
180% 312 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 233%
Great: 211%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
131GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 490
Write 311
Mixed 354
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 23.2
119% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 81.4
107% 195 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 118%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 92.2
Write 71.5
Mixed 117
72% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.17
74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$154
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 36.8
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback