Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '18 at 11:47
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 117 51% 83.4 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 176 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1801.1001 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.88 Parallax 8.91 3% 6.13 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 4.83 4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB 1,805 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: O112 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 425 Write 272 Mixed 331 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 79.7 4K Mixed 3.61 77% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 3.42 28% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 96%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: MK7O Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 151 Write 145 Mixed 120 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.46 133% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 754GB free Firmware: 1AG0 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 91.1 Write 58.5 Mixed 62.5 53% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.34 81% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 373GB free Firmware: 1AG0 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 67 Write 69.2 Mixed 74.2 53% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.35 87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.5% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.7 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	59x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	46x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	41x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16