Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140526
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '18 at 04:49
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80 3,108 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 46.2 2-Core 92.8 47% 72.7 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 184 25% 184 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2348 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Lighting 76.1 Reflection 74.2 Parallax 64.8 62% 71.7 fps	MRender 82.8 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 75 62% 76.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 56%
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.1% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 5.96 Parallax 4.81 4% 5.36 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 4.96 4% 4.44 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.1% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 74GB free Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2716 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1926 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 63 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 185218 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 18541000 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 4283971573 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	32.9% Below average	Read 252 Write 79 Mixed 119 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 5.6 45% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 73.6 DQ Mixed 5.82 34% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 44%
Ocz-vert EX 128GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.6 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 10 0 (0C) Power cycle count 171 2 0 (B8) Unknown 88 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 2 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 105 0 346742 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 155 9 175528 (C8) Write error rate 6 190 4698 (C9) Soft read error rate 73 208 2044 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 208 236 (CB) Run out cancel 103 179 210 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 136 19 0 (CE) Flying height 164 2 0 (CF) Spin high current 132 6 0 (D0) Spin buzz 104 5 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 73 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0 (D4) Unknown 0 0 0 (D5) Unknown 0 0 0	31.9% Below average	Read 223 Write 161 Mixed 182 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 6.97 41% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 7.04 10% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 36%
Intel 330 Series 60GB 2,582 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 46GB free Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -123686467294950 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 84 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 83 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 50150 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 50150 (F2) Unknown 100 100 47866 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1357	43.8% Average	Read 441 Write 67.4 Mixed 113 44% 207 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 10.4 70% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20.8 DQ Write 63.9 DQ Mixed 8.78 16% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-004.A00LF 99U5471-003.A01LF 99U5458-004.A00LF 99U5471-003.A01LF 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 12.7 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 82.4 49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	10x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
SP900 256GBAdata $300Bench 74%, 9,430 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	1x
99P5471-004.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 601 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16