Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q PRO TURBO (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121008
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '18 at 07:31
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 45.1 33% 46.5 Pts	4-Core 58.1 8-Core 63.6 8% 60.8 Pts	64-Core 61 4% 61 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% MSI(1462 2140) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 5.73 Parallax 6.19 6% 6.51 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 6.91 5% 5.95 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7639 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3426 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 297 (C2) HDA temperature 70 60 171799609374 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	46.6% Average	Read 240 Write 163 Mixed 219 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 19 81% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 87.7 DQ Mixed 21.4 26% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 102%
Seagate ST3250310NS 250GB-$80 1,187 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 203GB free Firmware: SN06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 63 194444863 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9574 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 95040306642 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19744 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 26 (0C) Power cycle count 92 37 8669 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 2728 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 538443807 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 60129542175 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 24 194444863 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	58.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 99.3 Mixed 32.8 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.47 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 60%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 11GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	9.12% Terrible	Read 29.4 Write 14.9 Mixed 18.1 24% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.55 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 26% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.12% Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Read 7.57 Write 4.36 Mixed 5.54 7% 5.82 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.006 10% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q PRO TURBO Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	16x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	9x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	9x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x

SSD
FireCuda 120 SSD ZA1000GM10001 1TBSeagateBench 114%, 477 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
M500 240GBCrucial $54Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	52x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $501

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16