Acer AOA150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer AOA150 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer
Memory	0.5 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '18 at 22:43
Run Duration	5714 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 42.9 1-Core 5.4 2-Core 7.4 16% 18.6 Pts	4-Core 7.4 8-Core 9.2 1% 8.3 Pts	64-Core 10.4 1% 10.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36 2,469 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0303 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 141112117 (03) Spinup time 99 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2344 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 94131495 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6514 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1540 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 90 47245361998 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 42 43555094564 (BF) G-sense error rate 95 95 11271 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 154 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 9 9 182041 (C2) HDA temperature 36 58 30064771108 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 47 141112117 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	20% Poor	Read 36.2 Write 33.7 Mixed 18.8 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.05 4K Write 0.47 4K Mixed 0.14 27% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 38%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 13GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 6.93 Mixed 8.85 13% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.74 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 11% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 512, 1024 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.35% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AOA150

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)