Asus VC66

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VC66 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK VC66
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '18 at 00:18
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 427 57% 428 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4550 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.1% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 10 Parallax 6.38 5% 7.56 fps	MRender 8.43 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 14 8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.1% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 33 (64) Unknown 100 100 171951 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 98 98 24 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 5 (B2) Unknown 100 100 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 104 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2536 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 41 0 81607786537 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 90 225 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 722 (F1) Unknown 100 100 556 (F2) Unknown 100 100 498 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 20311	64.5% Good	Read 499 Write 118 Mixed 144 55% 253 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 14.4 98% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 9.64 58% 139 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 214GB free Firmware: AM0B3J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1383 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 150 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17 (0A) Spinup retry count 103 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 31 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 791 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 208 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 184684707878 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 4 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 163 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	53.2% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 92.3 Mixed 85.7 68% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.21 69% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 298GB free, PID 022b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 39 Write 42.2 Mixed 37.4 51% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 20%
Seagate Portable 500GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 176GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 41.2 Mixed 17.6 40% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.29 50% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 36,396 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 20.9 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 24.3 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VC66 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VC66

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	32x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	14x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	11x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	58x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	10x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	15x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	3x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FJ CT8G4SFS824A.C8FR 16GBCrucialBench 68%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16