Lenovo 20266

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20266 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Yoga2
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '18 at 23:41
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%
CPU Throttled	74%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393 39,249 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 21.4 2-Core 44 32% 43.6 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 169 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 3.56 1% 2.93 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.13 3% 3.52 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GB 987 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT43L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5145 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3231 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 90 90 114 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 47 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 9195560 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 50 (EC) Unknown 99 99 66 (ED) Unknown 99 99 114 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	28.4% Poor	Read 332 Write 39.7 Mixed 72 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 6.72 38% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 14.5 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 6.93 14% 27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 0h clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20266 Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20266

CPU
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	112x
Core i7-4500UIntel $393Bench 50%, 39,249 samples	88x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	252x

SSD
MZMTE256HMHP-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 1,116 samples	85x
MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 987 samples	44x
MZMTE512HMHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 72%, 360 samples	17x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	222x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	29x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16