Samsung 500T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSamsung 500T  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG XE500T1C-H01TH
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140219
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMar 26 '18 at 21:51
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z2760
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Memory 30.2
1-Core 7.8
2-Core 13.6
13% 17.2 Pts
4-Core 20.4
8-Core 22.3
3% 21.3 Pts
64-Core 25.4
2% 25.4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
Sanyo(144D C0D6)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.14.3.1177
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.67 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SEM64G 63GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 61.3
Write 19.6
Mixed 27.8
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.58
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 1.84
477% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz clocked @ 1 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.04% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.83 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback