Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Apple MacPro5,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory	57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101007
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '18 at 09:56
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU-A (00), 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 178 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 695 62% 525 Pts	64-Core 1343 83% 1343 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.8% Very good	Lighting 100 Reflection 110 Parallax 97.4 82% 103 fps	MRender 87.9 Gravity 92.7 Splatting 78.5 70% 86.4 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 366GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3838 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 392 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 60 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 48 (F1) Unknown 99 99 35974258203	49.7% Average	Read 226 Write 178 Mixed 175 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 20.6 91% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 35.4 DQ Write 71.1 DQ Mixed 22.1 26% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 133%
Lacie P9227 Slim 2TB 851 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 410GB free Firmware: 1153 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 78.5 Write 75.5 Mixed 47.4 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 4.14 4K Mixed 0.31 150% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 67%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 378GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 164 2033 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10249 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23429 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2123 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 227 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 135 135 196866 (C2) HDA temperature 117 100 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	36.8% Below average	Read 61.1 Write 66.9 Mixed 34.4 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.18 75% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 77%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 163GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 83 (03) Spinup time 127 127 51579388509 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4394 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5351 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 547 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4395 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4395 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 197569675298 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	46.7% Average	Read 83.4 Write 79.1 Mixed 3.14 40% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.21 95% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 678GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 78 Write 85.2 Mixed 78.5 105% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.16 68% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 609GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 78.8 Write 75.2 Mixed 68.8 94% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.16 67% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 437GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 73.6 Write 74.6 Mixed 75 96% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.16 68% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.8% Above average	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 25.8 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	203x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	124x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	59x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	248x
RX 590AMD $200Bench 57%, 122,060 samples	57x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	52x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	106x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	67x
3x16GBUnknownBench 61%, 613 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $234

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16