PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq dc7900 Convertible Minitower (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3032h |
Memory | 2 GB free of 3.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090305 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 25 '18 at 23:24 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Asus(1043 835D) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.6%
Below average
|
||||
37.7%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 39GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 55x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 48x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 63x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 10x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $89 |