Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '18 at 21:16
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$198 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 96.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 231 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 650 62% 511 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 119 Parallax 101 92% 111 fps	MRender 99.4 Gravity 103 Splatting 105 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 2,693 Write 1,200 Mixed 1,432 389% 1,775 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 47.6 214% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 396 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 143 159% 272 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 236%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 57GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15075 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3802 (B1) Unknown 89 89 373 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 57 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 272 (F1) Unknown 99 99 40186775200	71.8% Very good	Read 503 Write 238 Mixed 358 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 20.9 96% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 84 DQ Mixed 63.5 79% 146 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 76%
Intenso Sata III 240GB 1,213 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 24GB free Firmware: O1015A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 204 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 654 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 126 (A3) Unknown 100 100 26 (A4) Unknown 100 100 18908 (A5) Unknown 100 100 23 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 9 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 69584 (F2) Unknown 100 100 172633 (F5) Unknown 100 100 75632	105% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 388 Mixed 421 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 41.4 154% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 88.1 123% 227 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 90%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 544GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 117 117 21494300969 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5297 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11344 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3590 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8841 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8841 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 231928954913 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1129	54.8% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 93.7 Mixed 94.9 72% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.26 70% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 64%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 168GB free Firmware: CT100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1600 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4247 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2496 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2099 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 33 (C2) HDA temperature 139 100 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 192550 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 1884 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	30.1% Below average	Read 51.3 Write 53.2 Mixed 39.9 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.31 75% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 152GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 94 (03) Spinup time 114 114 17192976585 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4359 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9127 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2676 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9913 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9913 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 210454249507 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.8% Above average	Read 111 Write 90.3 Mixed 82 71% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.24 66% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$41 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 28.1 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 29.9 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 50.7 79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	4,754x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,042x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	477x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,354x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	808x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	399x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	345x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	295x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	281x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	404x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	328x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $41Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	264x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,273

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16