Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '18 at 16:09
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 136 53% 89.5 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 183 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.79% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 9.46 Parallax 9.31 6% 8.82 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 11.3 8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 253GB free Firmware: ES2OA70H Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 217 217 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1228 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1910 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1001 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 131072 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 39 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 89538 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 240519151643 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	39.4% Below average	Read 71.3 Write 65.9 Mixed 17.5 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.32 70% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 46%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 132 130 4366 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1065 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8260 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1062 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 51 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1065 (C2) HDA temperature 108 90 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46.3% Average	Read 87.4 Write 74.2 Mixed 52 53% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.15 44% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905471-001.A01LF 4x2GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 13.6 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.9 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P9900 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	23x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	5x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples	3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 6 samples	3x
HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16