| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A |
| Memory | 3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111111 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 24 '18 at 12:26 |
| Run Duration | 102 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
| CPU Throttled | 50% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
|
37.8%
Below average
|
35% 51.6 Pts
|
9% 68.4 Pts
|
5% 75.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
|
2.21%
Terrible
|
2% 2.63 fps
|
3% 3.24 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
37.9%
Below average
|
38% 172 MB/s
|
53% 16.7 MB/s
|
32% 57.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
|
29.7%
Poor
|
31% 10.7 GB/s
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
34% 117 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A Builds (Compare 171 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 52x |
| Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples | 49x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 103x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 29x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $81 |