Ztsystem CYPRESS11

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Ztsystem CYPRESS11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel S2600CP
Memory	60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '18 at 08:05
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 83 2-Core 175 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 667 59% 498 Pts	64-Core 1,644 102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 24.5 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 33.6 20% 27.9 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 29.1 Splatting 26.2 25% 31 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -39290359919585 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1889 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1093 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 106 106 13294100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1093 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 324519 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 57 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 324519 (F2) Unknown 100 100 445138 (F9) Unknown 100 100 11892	46.8% Average	Read 481 Write 150 Mixed 227 62% 286 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 9.14 60% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.4 DQ Write 30.7 DQ Mixed 7.55 11% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$37 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: MK7ONS01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 128 128 38686556648 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 134 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 133 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 57 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 135 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 135 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 154619871260 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67.7% Good	Read 116 Write 120 Mixed 99.5 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.45 127% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 8x8GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 70.4 MC Write 42.2 MC Mixed 46.5 152% 53 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.3 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CYPRESS11 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

System: Ztsystem CYPRESS11

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LM480HCHP-000G3 480GBSamsungBench 95%, 6 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 64GBSamsungBench 56%, 3 samples	3x
AM472D3LD4P13C9EC 14x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 3 samples	2x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $340

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16