Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120705
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '18 at 21:30
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 178 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 438 45% 365 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1367 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 37.4 Parallax 48.5 33% 42 fps	MRender 53 Gravity 47.8 Splatting 37.5 37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 8448702 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 116797340668563 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4996 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 455 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 42952294426 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8448702 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8448702 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8448702 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 19479 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19376 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19376 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20916	59% Above average	Read 356 Write 210 Mixed 233 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 12.9 97% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 12.1 34% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 91GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17134 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7022 (B1) Unknown 98 98 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 58 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4225 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5190640705	61.1% Good	Read 348 Write 157 Mixed 208 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 21.9 106% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 45.3 59% 108 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 108%
Seagate ST8000NE0004-1ZF11G 8TB 260 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 6TB free Firmware: EN01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 66 234652199 (03) Spinup time 89 89 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 489 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 17949664 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -70952859729483 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 130 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 71 64 488374301 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 413 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1395 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 81604378653 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 84 66 234652199 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -104505144246188 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2813549163 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1104408330	112% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 190 Mixed 169 140% 186 MB/s	4K Read 2.84 4K Write 7.65 4K Mixed 0.33 296% 3.61 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 125%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 186 180 30570 (03) Spinup time 253 161 2050 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15203 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 27773 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5990 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 635 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 42 42 474863 (C2) HDA temperature 123 99 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 66 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 172 9	58.4% Above average	Read 108 Write 95.4 Mixed 81.6 71% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	91% Outstanding	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 34.2 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.2 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	74x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	52x
Core i7-3930KIntelBench 77%, 4,060 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	5x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	8x
16G-D3-2133-M 2x8GBUnknownBench 45%, 39 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 64%, 1,012 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16