HP CQ1140UKm

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP CQ1140UKm (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 2ACA
Memory	0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111014
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '18 at 21:23
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 53.9 1-Core 18.3 2-Core 35.5 26% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 32.4 8-Core 35.6 4% 34 Pts	64-Core 35.5 2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2ACA) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.1.3000 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 1.56 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP16 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 98669528 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1294 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 120 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 39194598286 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 28324 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1134 (B4) Unknown 100 100 3599513903 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 4295032950 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 44 35132866605 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 38 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1294 (C2) HDA temperature 45 56 47244640301 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 8 98669528 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 120 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	63.4% Good	Read 119 Write 102 Mixed 94.5 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.43 85% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 287GB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 23.9 Mixed 6.8 22% 18 MB/s	4K Read 1.22 4K Write 2.48 4K Mixed 0.36 101% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 115GB free, PID 047a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 26.4 Mixed 24.7 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 1x4GB 1,817 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 5 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.83 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16