User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	GBT___ AWRDACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte 8I945PLGE-RH
Memory	1.7 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '18 at 15:41
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz 3,782 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 39.4 1-Core 14.5 2-Core 22.6 19% 25.5 Pts	4-Core 38.1 8-Core 27 5% 32.5 Pts	64-Core 40.6 2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1600 19 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Gigabyte(1458 2146) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 0.44 1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380817AS 80GB-$130 2,079 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 74GB free Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 53 47 207382453 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2307 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 687670203 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10803 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2321 (C2) HDA temperature 34 44 21474836514 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 46 207382453 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 187 13 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	32.4% Below average	Read 56 Write 56.6 Mixed 27 34% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 32%
Seagate ST3120026AS 105GB 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.05 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 60 53 225843953 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 348 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 898035033 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 38014 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2201 (C2) HDA temperature 47 59 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 52 225843953 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 119 116 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28.3% Poor	Read 47.9 Write 50.6 Mixed 22.6 30% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.23 62% 0.53 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)