| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Foxconn M61PMP/M61PMP-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100607 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '18 at 02:46 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | VEN-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.4%
Average
|
40% 52 Pts
|
5% 36.5 Pts
|
2% 37.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Device(105B 0EFB) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8
|
||||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
65.5%
Good
|
84% 112 MB/s
|
89% 0.65 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905474-019.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.4%
Very poor
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
10% 3.5 GB/s
|
52% 77.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M61PMP/M61PMP-K Builds (Compare 12 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn M61PMP/M61PMP-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples | 2x |
| Athlon II X3 455AMD $90Bench 45%, 3,733 samples | 2x |
| Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 2x |
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $152 |