Asus CG8250

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus CG8250 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8250
Memory	7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111227
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '18 at 20:56
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$195 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 171 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 469 48% 391 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.6 32% 35.3 fps	MRender 35.8 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 35.2 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16350 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 722 (B1) Unknown 98 98 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 46 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10462013656	41.1% Average	Read 219 Write 150 Mixed 154 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 13.8 75% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 28.5 DQ Mixed 13.1 14% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 118%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 22GB free Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 9584913 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 41626823037486 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2145 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 306 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 69 64429031454 (C2) HDA temperature 30 69 64429031454 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9584913 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9584913 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9584913 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3931 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1974 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1974 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3303	32.7% Below average	Read 197 Write 75.5 Mixed 113 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 11.9 60% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 76.9 DQ Mixed 10.9 21% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 189GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 88 72 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4582 (05) Reallocated sector count 80 80 6664 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 13146391732 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6762 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3228 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1638 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 50 521601055 (C2) HDA temperature 31 50 60129542175 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 27 72 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 1 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 1 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 68938520074761 (F1) Unknown 100 253 435993488 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4120973616	57.3% Above average	Read 97.1 Write 103 Mixed 105 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.45 92% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 SLZ302G08-MDJHB SLZ302G08-MDJHB SLZ302G08-MDJHB 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	84x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	18x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	17x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	16x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	9x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
EL63I1C1624ZV 2x4GBAdataBench 48%, 365 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	5x
EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GBAdataBench 48%, 10 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $535

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16