ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150116
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '18 at 17:55
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335 868 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 178 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 684 62% 522 Pts	64-Core 908 56% 908 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Lighting 48.5 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 39.1 40% 39.9 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 42.9 Splatting 37.6 32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3.5TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10407 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 400 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 855 (0A) Spinup retry count 108 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 141 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 762 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 146029674521 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 685 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 561 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	101% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 173 Mixed 189 136% 180 MB/s	4K Read 1.96 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.22 148% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: FJ1M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7037 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 146 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 863 (0A) Spinup retry count 102 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 415 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 148 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 176094642207 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 862 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 565 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	105% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 186 Mixed 169 134% 179 MB/s	4K Read 1.34 4K Write 3.14 4K Mixed 0.52 172% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 768GB free Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 9946839 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10648 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 4825485136 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13311 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3289 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 73016344611 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 50 454361115 (C2) HDA temperature 27 50 73014444059 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 15 13 9946839 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 32710470950759 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2179421790 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1997178150	64.2% Good	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 90.9 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 8x4GB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 30.6 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback