Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M32CD4-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '18 at 10:50
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 426 57% 426 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 203B) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 31.7 28% 30.9 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 31.9 28% 34 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1253 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 630 (64) Unknown 100 100 3648880 (A8) Unknown 97 97 40 (A9) Unknown 84 84 175 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 5 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 90 90 110 (B2) Unknown 100 100 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 92 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2548 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 0 64427458586 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 81 1 3186 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 15387 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6513 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3916 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 12750900	69.7% Good	Read 513 Write 126 Mixed 190 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 82.9 4K Mixed 14.4 110% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 15 67% 155 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 701GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 134 134 12896960669 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 967 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1309 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 628 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3121 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 171799674908 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 183 Mixed 170 136% 181 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.21 90% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 21,551 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 11.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	394x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	262x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	207x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	91x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	50x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	60x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	48x
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	21x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	105x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 51%, 2,347 samples	47x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16