| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4N98TD EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101122 |
| Uptime | 6.6 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 20 '18 at 23:33 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.9%
Above average
|
49% 71.9 Pts
|
25% 203 Pts
|
15% 243 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.3%
Poor
|
21% 22.6 fps
|
20% 24.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
61.7%
Good
|
79% 105 MB/s
|
90% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.6%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
20% 7.07 GB/s
|
59% 67.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4N98TD EVO Builds (Compare 49 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4N98TD EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 12x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 11x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 5500AMDBench 3%, 5,613 samples | 3x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $311 |