Visual AllBook X

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Visual AllBook X (all builds)
Motherboard	Visual AllBook X
Memory	0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '18 at 23:26
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 43.8 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 84.5 34% 56.9 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 94.7 19% 128 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4664 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.44 2% 2.21 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.37 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 128GB 7,443 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 119GB free Firmware: Q0518BS Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 33 (A3) Unknown 100 100 11 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1400 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 2 (94) Unknown 100 100 1053 (95) Unknown 100 100 40 (96) Unknown 100 100 1 (97) Unknown 100 100 30 (9F) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1500 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3920 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3890 (F5) Unknown 100 100 12600	50.6% Above average	Read 468 Write 257 Mixed 306 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 8.8 52% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 32.6 DQ Mixed 26.5 19% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 102%
Sandisk DF4032 31GB 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.9% Poor	Read 263 Write 105 Mixed 153 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 7.29 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 3.72 23% 7.98 MB/s	DQ Read 7.56 DQ Write 11.9 DQ Mixed 2.99 4% 7.47 MB/s

SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 31GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 19.9 Mixed 24.3 29% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.12 4K Write 0.59 4K Mixed 0.46 47% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2 of 2 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Visual AllBook X

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)