| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140403 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 20 '18 at 19:39 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.3%
Good
|
63% 101 Pts
|
38% 314 Pts
|
24% 393 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
PwrHis(1787 A480) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2105 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.5%
Average
|
40% 66.1 fps
|
49% 61 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
99.2%
Outstanding
|
126% 168 MB/s
|
208% 2.26 MB/s
| |
|
|
40.5%
Average
|
51% 68.1 MB/s
|
115% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.6%
Above average
|
55% 19.1 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |