Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130 3,684 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 46.8 2-Core 152 59% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 147 25% 174 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3086) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.61 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.26 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63 12,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1117 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 41 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 97 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196615 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 372	39.2% Below average	Read 497 Write 40.6 Mixed 257 57% 265 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 7.97 51% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 70.7 DQ Mixed 44.8 35% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16