Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 19 '18 at 18:26
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 62
2-Core 89.6
46% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 188
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 12.9
13% 16.7 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
117GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 94.8
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 61.9
Write 27.4
Mixed 40.4
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.29
71% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 69%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 32GB
5GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Read 39.7
Write 8.98
Mixed 10.5
19% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.03
23% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 15.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback