Asus N501VW

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus N501VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N501VW
Memory	19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '18 at 10:50
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 176 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 535 52% 426 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 1080) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9101 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Lighting 9.27 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 18.4 8% 14.8 fps	MRender 24.1 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 17 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 516GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1887 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1644 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 50 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13458875652	88.6% Excellent	Read 497 Write 397 Mixed 383 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 28.5 106% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 103 121% 212 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 133%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 22GB free, PID 0330 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	8.41% Terrible	Read 17.6 Write 15.7 Mixed 15.6 21% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.29 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.31 44% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.41% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 0215 CMSO16GX4M1A2133C15 24GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	63.5% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 19.4 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 18.6 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 99.7 40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N501VW Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N501VW

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	424x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	276x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	144x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	174x
HFS256G39MND-2300A 256GBBench 64%, 2,675 samples	40x
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples	36x

RAM
M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBSamsungBench 65%, 1,104 samples	99x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GBSamsungBench 65%, 2,218 samples	57x
VepIqTRrEPqQfI Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GBMicronBench 64%, 500 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $69

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16