Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '18 at 06:26
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 698 68% 557 Pts	64-Core 909 56% 909 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.6 94% 109 fps	MRender 97.2 Gravity 103 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9464708 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 130068789601670 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6539 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 742 (B1) Unknown 0 0 95 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 50 81607655459 (C2) HDA temperature 35 50 81607655459 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9464708 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9464708 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9464708 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 39190 (EA) Unknown 0 0 34888 (F1) Unknown 0 0 34888 (F2) Unknown 0 0 49111 (F4) Unknown 95 95 196673700	58.2% Above average	Read 507 Write 167 Mixed 269 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 10.8 79% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 45.2 55% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 102 (03) Spinup time 118 118 51579585124 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1518 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 37 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 35 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 42359 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1360 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1624 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1624 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 223339544613 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 37 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.6% Good	Read 105 Write 106 Mixed 94 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.29 89% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 68%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 425GB free Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 99 3795800 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1192 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 9375568 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1496 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1054 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 76 76 24 (BE) vendor-specific 67 55 555417633 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1195 (C2) HDA temperature 33 45 73014444065 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.5% Very good	Read 131 Write 115 Mixed 111 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.18 68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 2,519 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	88% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 29.6 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 24.8 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	82x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	77x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	41x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	41x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16