Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '18 at 05:02
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 69 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 151 58% 99.8 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 391 41% 327 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 37.5 34% 36.8 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 40.7 Splatting 36.1 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 31%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 30 Parallax 3.94 4% 12.8 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 8.87 5% 5.89 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 578GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 406 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 471 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 853433147	95.9% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 406 Mixed 418 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 35.7 126% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 125 133% 223 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 133%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 1,871 Write 1,064 Mixed 1,202 304% 1,379 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 49.8 172% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 93.6 101% 173 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 1x16GB 690 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 10.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.4 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	246x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	107x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	64x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	22x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	14x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	27x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	23x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	15x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $42

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16