Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '18 at 22:01
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 94.5 45% 71.2 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 188 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 8365) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Lighting 9.53 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 8.03 8% 9.57 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 9.83 Splatting 10.7 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 466GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 54 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 28 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 68 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 206175401	57.8% Above average	Read 255 Write 189 Mixed 205 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 28.2 100% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 55.7 58% 96 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2849 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 813 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 57 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9658228344	52.1% Above average	Read 261 Write 191 Mixed 204 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 16.3 85% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 99.1 DQ Mixed 17 38% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB 4,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 87GB free Firmware: CC2F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 24757893 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5486 (05) Reallocated sector count 96 96 197 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 609736145 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15477 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 5096 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 85 85 15 (BC) Unknown 100 1 94490737866 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 622 (BE) vendor-specific 77 56 387383319 (C2) HDA temperature 23 44 47244640279 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 30 24757893 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 15266 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 41759967034428 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3535383237 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3536414446	35.2% Below average	Read 97.9 Write 24.8 Mixed 93.7 55% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.22 54% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 65%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 700GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 23.4 Mixed 12 24% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.22 59% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.7% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16