PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100311 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 18 '18 at 15:12 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 78% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3540
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.1%
Good
|
||||
24.9%
Poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
46.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 115x |
Xeon W3690Intel $990Bench 77%, 4,808 samples | 14x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 14x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $320 |