To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '18 at 14:22
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 32.2
2-Core 64.9
37% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 129
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 359.21
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 3.87
3% 3.49 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
292GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 87
Mixed 72.2
64% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003DEM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 54.9
Write 52.3
Mixed 19.6
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.61
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 39%
StoreJet Transcend 250GB
51GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.5
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.27
65% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CK0 V01L3LF4GB26826816 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback