Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory17GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 17GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory12.4 GB free of 17 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 12:01
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 75.6
51% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 128
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 59.5
36% 45.1 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 47
Splatting 40
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
309GB free
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 279
Write 255
Mixed 231
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 9.12
53% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 12.2
16% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 99%
Transcend SSD320 64GB-$128
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 139
Write 58.3
Mixed 84.8
21% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 8.43
70% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 54
DQ Mixed 9.45
15% 28 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 48%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
87GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 114
Write 75.6
Mixed 76.7
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-015.A03LF 1315 CT102464BA160B.M16 KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 17GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback