Sony VPCF115FM

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sony VPCF115FM (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100514
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '18 at 04:32
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 92 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 97.8 57% 85.2 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 201 21% 170 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 9067) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 1.25 2% 2.85 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.26 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6843 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1392 (B1) Unknown 96 96 42 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 48 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17094342671	23.1% Poor	Read 258 Write 95 Mixed 129 35% 161 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 1.33 26% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 118%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 32GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 27GB free Firmware: 02 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 18.5 Mixed 18.6 14% 19 MB/s	4K Read 4.92 4K Write 2.87 4K Mixed 2.21 504% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 13%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB 2,661 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 296GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 23 Mixed 23.6 32% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.23 62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.4% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VPCF115FM Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF115FM

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	31x
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SD7TB3Q-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 79%, 782 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	15x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16