Asus P7P55D-E DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '18 at 20:01
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 165 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 427 43% 349 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB; GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1060 6G (rev. 2.0) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Lighting 81.4 Reflection 80.2 Parallax 76.7 66% 79.4 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 74.9 Splatting 76.6 61% 74.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SiImage 120GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 10GB free Firmware: 0000 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.2% Poor	Read 144 Write 43.4 Mixed 91.6 20% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.96 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 5.85 46% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 99.6 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 32.3 38% 66.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 65%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 23729 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5996 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 72 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 527528 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 4161 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 3427370418 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 94 94 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	33.7% Below average	Read 222 Write 60.2 Mixed 83.6 26% 122 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 6.9 69% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20.9 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 6.06 14% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 117GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 183 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 73 72 8296 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8197 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22194 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5964 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 176094117917 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 7 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 8205	84.8% Excellent	Read 136 Write 160 Mixed 32.5 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.79 4K Mixed 0.49 136% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 75%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 256GB-$126 448 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 225GB free, PID 16b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 33 Write 28.3 Mixed 16.5 31% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.43 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.55 57% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.7 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E DELUXE Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E DELUXE

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	31x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	12x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	10x

GPU
RX 5600-XTAMD $300Bench 83%, 112,731 samples	5x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	28x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	25x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $728

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16