| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Dell Studio XPS 1640 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0U785D |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110409 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 16 '18 at 04:32 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 68% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.9%
Below average
|
33% 47.9 Pts
|
9% 67.4 Pts
|
4% 72.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Dell(1028 0272) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.901.1.1000
|
1.27%
Terrible
|
1% 1.22 fps
|
2% 1.92 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
43% 195 MB/s
|
79% 26.7 MB/s
|
44% 75.6 MB/s
|
|
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
31% 25 MB/s
|
82% 1.01 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.9%
Very poor
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
12% 4.33 GB/s
|
35% 115 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 1640 Builds (Compare 48 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 1640
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 12x |
| Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobility Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 2,160 samples | 25x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 3670ATIBench 2%, 405 samples | 22x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4600ATIBench 4%, 1 sample | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 36% - Below average | Total price: $80 |