Foxconn 975X7AB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Foxconn 975X7AB (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 975X7AB
Memory	0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080816
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '18 at 04:30
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	TUN-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 27.2 2-Core 53.8 37% 51.6 Pts	4-Core 92.9 8-Core 93.2 12% 93.1 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2356 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Above average	Lighting 72.5 Reflection 77.8 Parallax 69.4 59% 73.2 fps	MRender 86.5 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 71.1 62% 76.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 79GB free Firmware: KF100-06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4352 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10158 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8207 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4689 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 2230 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 157 121 654704667 (C2) HDA temperature 166 121 654704664 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2230 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 706	25.8% Poor	Read 37.7 Write 51.9 Mixed 44.2 34% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.35 84% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 53%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: KF100-06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 34 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4288 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 9002 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10921 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4691 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 76975607 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 131072 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 139 100 772145185 (C2) HDA temperature 145 97 788922399 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 76975607 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 74 74 8854	37.7% Below average	Read 65.2 Write 66.1 Mixed 21.8 37% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.35 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x1GB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.97% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 1.6 6% 1.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.97% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 975X7AB Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Foxconn 975X7AB

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	1x

SSD
SATAIII 120GBIntensoBench 60%, 464 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16