HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	176GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 176GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	164.3 GB free of 176 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '18 at 16:27
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 138 51% 88.8 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 516 46% 392 Pts	64-Core 1,012 63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000 1,540 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	51.4% Above average	Lighting 62.5 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 69.2 51% 67 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 62.8 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
H/W RAID1 240GB 104GB free Firmware: 80003040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	62.7% Good	Read 246 Write 248 Mixed 243 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 22 112% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.4 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 25.5 41% 75.2 MB/s

Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 90GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3584 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1904 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 59 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4736632483	97.4% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 499 Mixed 397 105% 471 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 25.8 123% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 78.9 96% 170 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 116%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 104 (03) Spinup time 115 115 51580699252 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2251 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 36 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 32548 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1116 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2274 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2274 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 214749675556 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.1% Good	Read 115 Write 115 Mixed 15.7 59% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.37 98% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 11x16GB 11 of 12 slots used 176GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.8% Very good	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 31.4 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.2 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16