Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 195 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 490 50% 404 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 094E) 512MB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 353.30 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 255GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.12 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 480 Write 408 Mixed 442 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 27.6 96% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 72.8 90% 157 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 85%
Dell PERC H310 1TB 470 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 443GB free Firmware: 2.12 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 145 Write 151 Mixed 137 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.32 125% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB 528 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 34 MC Write 39.3 MC Mixed 34.4 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16