PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 15 '18 at 00:58 |
Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.9%
Very poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.9%
Excellent
|
||||
80.8%
Excellent
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |