User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 22:23
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 163
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 454
44% 364 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0416) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 6.06
3% 12.4 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 6.83
5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE512HMJH-000SO 512GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT2200Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 505
Write 302
Mixed 331
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 17.5
108% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 17
43% 84.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback