Gateway MD2419U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway MD2419U  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 19:43
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-65
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 45.7
27% 39 Pts
4-Core 58.9
8-Core 60
8% 59.5 Pts
64-Core 59.3
4% 59.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Gateway(107B 0701) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.71 fps
MRender 0.76
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.91
0% 0.65 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEOC40C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 41.2
Mixed 9.7
24% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.18
39% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback